A scientific study of tongue-speaking?

“…test them all; hold on to what is good, 22 reject every kind of evil. says 1 Thes. 5.

3215358Okay, I want to test if the thing called “speaking in tongues” done in Charismatic churches is really a supernatural gift and not just meaningless sounds. I know the Bible has something called “speaking in tongues” but is this the same thing Charismatics do nowadays?

This is actually potentially easy to study. Many charismatic churches have people speaking in tongues during sermons, or explaining it. Sometimes, nowadays, church sermons are electronically recorded.

For a scientific study of speaking in tongues, I propose this study:

You need:

a) Recordings of people, at least 5 of them from different churches, speaking in tongues at church. (During personal prayer does not count – the Bible teaching about prayer time tongue-speaking is that it is between the praying believer and God, and does not need to be understood by anyone else.)

b) People, at least 5 of them from different churches, who claim to have the gift of interpreting tongues.

The method:

Present the the 5 or more recordings of tongue speaking to each of the 5 or more interpreters. Write down their translations. (The reason for 5 or more is so that a fake interpreter or fake tongue speaker can be identified from between the group.)

Compare their answers.

————

Dear reader, does this suggestion shock you? I am sure that, as believers, we could want to know the results of a study like this. The difference between believers and unbelievers is that we are willing to act on evidence, and should be willing to persue this if it actually is from God.

 

Advertisements

About Retha

Attempting to question everything, reject the bad and hold fast to the good.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to A scientific study of tongue-speaking?

  1. Morris Katz says:

    Tests of tongues-speaking have been done for decades. They fail, but they can come up with many excuses. Pick one like “The Spirit does not work in a test tube, so it doesn’t count.” or “The same message can have multiple interpretations.”

    In the 1970s a fundamentalist pastor deliberately spoke in tongues and there was an interpretation. He then announced he had just quoted John 3:16 in Greek. The tongues church security promptly sent him away and ignored it. Go figure.

    • Retha says:

      Can you point me to studies? I can find studies that prove an altered state of (a part of) the mind during tongue speaking. This kind of study does not prove or disprove the actual words at all. Can you point to studies that “fail”?

  2. Omid says:

    Why shouldn’t the Bible and the activities therein not stand up to the scrutiny of the scientific method? That truly works both ways between science and the subject of scrutiny. We as Christians often sound incredibly ignorant when we attempt to defend our faith and allow ourselves to be drawn into emotional response rather than reasoned discussion.

    I’d posit that the honest Christian with the gift of tongues would find themselves used in this manner more than once. If the Bible says to test the spirits and compare them to the Word it stands to reason we could stand up to some scrutiny as well and prove our faith isn’t bunk!

    If the researcher is honest in their approach and the result demonstrates the truth of a thing, then it can be reproduced independently and published and stand up to scrutiny! It must also stand to reach if the researcher is honest they must accept the truth of their finding when it does stand against scrutiny.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s